President Trump speaks at the UN
May 08, · Right, but President Rouhani did say today that you would enrich higher than if you don't get those economic incentives, which haven't come so far. Majid Takht-Ravanchi: Of course. Sep 23, · When Mr. Rouhani arrives to speak to the General Assembly on Wednesday, Mr. Zarif said, the Iranian president will announce a “Coalition for Hope” Estimated Reading Time: 8 mins.
Iran said it plans to cease complying with portions of the nuclear deal it signed with Western powers inthough it didn't withdraw from the agreement altogether. But the announcement increases already escalating tensions with the U. Today, Iran announced it plans to stop complying with portions of the nuclear deal it signed with Western powers in Iran stopped short of withdrawing from the deal altogether.
But, as Nick Schifrin reports, the announcement increases already escalating tensions with the United States. The Iran deal made a fundamental trade: Iran restricted its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. One year ago today, the Trump administration withdrew from the deal, and has since reimposed what did the president of iran say to the un. For the last year, Iran complied with the deal, but, today, Iran said it would not abide by all the deal's restrictions.
Number one, the deal limits Iran's stockpiles of low-enriched uranium, which is nuclear fuel, and heavy water, which is used to operate a nuclear reactor.
How to draw avatar characters step by step, Iran said it would no longer adhere to those limits. And if Iran does exceed the caps, it will no longer be in compliance with the deal. And then Iran threatened even more dramatic actions. To produce a bomb, you typically need to enrich uranium at 90 percent. Before the deal, Iran enriched uranium at nearly 20 percent, which the U.
After the deal, Iran enriched uranium at 3. Today, Iran said if it doesn't receive economic benefits allowed by the deal in the next 60 days, it not would adhere to — quote — "any uranium enrichment limit. Our how to play pro street online should know that we have not withdrawn from the nuclear deal.
They shouldn't think that the nuclear deal doesn't exist anymore. Today, we announced a reduction, not withdrawal. You have gone a whole year since the Trump administration pulled out of the Iran deal without responding in a major way.
Why respond today? Over the last year, we exercised extreme patience in order to show that Iran is ready, Iran is ready to take extra mile, in order to show that it is sincere in its implementation of the nuclear deal.
But, unfortunately, due to U. And then we were left with no other option than to say that, for 60 days, we are going to stop implementing or to cease performance of some of our obligations, voluntary obligations, based on the nuclear deal. And we will see what will happen during the next 60 days. The window of diplomacy is not closed. We believe that Iran will speak, will negotiate with the partners, the remaining participants of the JCPOA, and we will see what will be the outcome of the negotiations.
Ambassador, you say that you were left with no other option, but why do you need to enrich uranium at a higher level than 3. What's your intentions by doing that — or possibly doing that?
Well, no, for the time being, we are adhering to the JCPOA on the limit of the enrichment, the level of enrichment. What we have said is, for the next 60 days, we are going just to be free for our stockpile.
We are not talking about enriching more than 3. Right, but President Rouhani did say today that you would enrich higher than 3. The reason is that our partners have had more than enough time, for the last year-and-a-half or so, to — for the last year or so — I'm sorry — to compensate what the Americans have done to the JCPOA. So if they cannot do it in the next two months, that means that the political will is not there. And then we will act in accordance with our national interests. Today, President Trump said that he still hoped to meet with Iran's leadership.
Does Iran have any interest in meeting with President Trump? There is — I mean, there is no utility in meeting somebody who carelessly tear apart, you know, an international agreement.
It wasn't an agreement between Iran and the United States. Other countries, the European Union were part of it. So, all of a sudden, we see that the president comes and says, I don't like it because of so many reasons, what do gp doctors do the former president took the initiative to sign such an agreement with Iran. Ambassador, quickly, in the time we have left, there are some people who I'm talking to here who are experts on Iran fear that the speech by President Rouhani today will allow hard-liners here in the U.
I think the hard-liners, as our foreign minister has coined it, four B's, Bibi Netanyahu, Bolton, bin Zayed, and bin Salman, they are doing whatever they can, no matter what Iran does. Their agenda is to provoke. Their agenda is to agitate the situation. Their agenda is to prepare a war against Iran. We are not trying to wage war against anybody, but, definitely, we will defend ourselves no matter what. Ambassador Majid Ravanchi, ambassador of Iran to the United Nations, thank you so much for your time.
Support Provided By: Learn more. Friday, Apr The Latest. World Agents for Change. Health Long-Term Care. What do you need to get a drivers permit Teachers.
About Feedback Funders Support Jobs. Close Menu. Email Address Subscribe. What do you think? Leave a respectful comment. Close Comment Window. Yes Not now. Leave a comment. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. Transcript Audio. Judy Woodruff: Today, Iran announced it plans to stop complying with portions of the nuclear deal it signed with Western powers in Nick Schifrin: The Iran deal made a fundamental trade: Iran restricted its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
Hassan Rouhani through translator : Our nation should know that we have not withdrawn from the nuclear deal. Ambassador, thank you so much for joining the "NewsHour" today. Majid Takht-Ravanchi: Over the last year, we exercised extreme patience in order to show that Iran is ready, Iran is ready to take extra mile, in order to show that it is sincere in its implementation of the nuclear deal.
Nick Schifrin: Ambassador, you say that you were left with no other option, but why do you need to enrich uranium at a higher level than 3. Nick Schifrin: Right, but President Rouhani did say today that you would enrich higher than 3.
Majid Takht-Ravanchi: Of course. Of course we will. Majid Takht-Ravanchi: There is — I mean, there is no utility in meeting somebody who carelessly tear apart, you know, an international agreement. So, how can we trust somebody who carelessly and recklessly do something like this? Nick Schifrin: Ambassador, quickly, in the time we have left, there are some people who I'm talking to here who are experts on Iran fear that the speech by President Rouhani today will allow hard-liners here in the U.
What's your response to that? Majid Takht-Ravanchi: I think the hard-liners, as our foreign minister has coined it, four B's, Bibi Netanyahu, Bolton, bin Zayed, and bin Salman, they are doing whatever they can, no matter what Iran does.
Majid Takht-Ravanchi: Thank you, sir. Listen to this Segment. More Ways to Watch. Additional Support Provided By:.
What we covered here
Summary. HASSAN ROUHANI, President of Iran, said he came from a region of the world whose many parts were currently burning in the fire of extremism and radicalism. Oct 09, · President Rouhani said the Holocaust was a "reprehensible and condemnable crime". But as many people listening to his interviews on the fringe Estimated Reading Time: 5 mins. Feb 19, · UNITED NATIONS -- The Biden administration on Thursday rescinded former president Donald Trump’s restoration of U.N. sanctions on Iran, an .
To the east and west of his country, extremists threatened its neighbours and resorted to violence and bloodshed. They did not speak a "single" language nor were they of a "single" skin colour or nationality; they had come to the Middle East from around the world with a shared ideology of violence and extremism.
Deeply regretful that terrorism had become globalized, he said the extremists of the world had found each other and put out the call "extremists of the world unite".
To that, he asked, "But are we united against the extremists? He said that extremism was not a regional issue that only the nations in his region would have to confront. It was a global issue that certain States had helped create and for which their peoples were paying the price.
Today's anti-Westernism was the offspring of yesterday's colonialism and a reaction to yesterday's racism. To fight the underlying causes of terrorism, he emphasized that poverty, unemployment, discrimination, humiliation and injustice must be addressed, pointing out that the strategic blunders of the West in the Middle East, Central Asia and the Caucuses had turned those parts of the world into a haven for terrorists and extremists.
Military aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq and improper interference in the developments in Syria were clear examples of that erroneous strategic approach in the Middle East, he noted. Democracy was the product of growth and development, not of war and aggression. It was not a product that could be commercially imported from the West to the East. In an underdeveloped society, imported democracy led only to a weak and vulnerable Government.
Further, he warned against the spread of extremism and the danger posed by an inadequate understanding and incorrect approach to that phenomenon, adding that all the nations in the region must exert broad cooperation on social and political as well as security and defence issues to reach a common and durable understanding. He called the continued oppressive sanctions against a moderate and independent Iran a strategic mistake.
In the past year, his country had engaged in transparent dialogue to build confidence regarding its peaceful nuclear programme, noting that only through negotiations could the issue be resolved. It remained committed to continuing a peaceful nuclear programme and negotiations in earnest and good faith.
However, Iranians could not trust in any security cooperation between their Government and those who had imposed sanctions, creating obstacles to their accessing food and medicine. Reaching a final nuclear agreement with Iran would be an historic opportunity for the West to show that it did not oppose the advancement and development of others, did not discriminate in adhering to international rules and regulations, demonstrating that the way to resolution was through negotiation and respect, not conflict and sanction.
He said his Government's policy was to work towards constructive interaction with its neighbours on the basis of mutual respect and emphasis on common interests.
If the right approach was not taken in dealing with violence and extremism, the international community would find a more turbulent and tumultuous region that would have repercussions for the rest of the world. However, while the right solution must be one with international support, it must come from within the region, he concluded..
First Declaration: Speaking in exercise of the right of reply, the representative of Iran responded to the issue of the Iranian islands raised by the United Arab Emirates, reiterating that his country maintained full sovereignty of the islands of Abu Musa and the Greater and Lesser Tunbs in the Persian Gulf. Iran expressed its willingness to enter into discussions on that matter with the United Arab Emirates to clarify any misunderstanding that may have occurred on the issue.
First Declaration: Speaking in exercise of the right of reply, the representative of Iran said that the representative of the Israeli regime had made baseless accusations and distorted passages against his Government, which were designed to defend the atrocities that it had recently committed against a whole civilian population.
That speaker had tried in vain to wash his hands of that most recent bloodbath in Gaza, perpetrated before the eyes of the whole world. He rushed to the General Assembly to hopelessly wage another war against the whole Islamic world and civilization, associating them baselessly with the ISIS terrorist group and propagating Iranophobia and Islamophobia.
All of that was done to the applause of a crowd brought in from outside the United Nations. He said it was ironic that a regime famous for its atrocities, apartheid policies and war crimes could allow itself to accuse other countries in such a sinister way. It was also preposterous that the same regime with a highly known record of developing, producing and stockpiling different kinds of inhumane weapons, including nuclear weapons, ventured to falsely accuse others of trying to acquire similar weapons.
It was "laughable" for many to hear such a person speak of the atrocities by the ISIS terrorist group when, under his command, there had been an aggression against Gaza in which all international norms and laws were blatantly flouted, leading to the killing of more than 2, Palestinian civilians, mostly women and children and the elderly, and rendering more than a half a million people homeless.
Those people had already been living under an inhumane and suffocating Israeli blockade for eight years. Against that backdrop, he said that speaker had claimed to be concerned over the Iranian nuclear program, which was fully peaceful and under international supervision. Iran and others in the region had the right to worry about nuclear weapons in the hands of a regime that had shown, time and again, its capacity and propensity to kill.
Historic evidence bore testimony to that fact, and the term was also internationally recognized, including repeatedly by the United Nations. Skip to main navigation Skip to content. Welcome to the United Nations. It's your world. Right of Reply in all available languages Audio files Videos.